Network, applications, identity
Azure security for mid-sized and industrial companies
We plan, build and run Azure security for your environment: from network segmentation and protecting your applications and APIs to identity as the perimeter. For IT leadership, cloud architects and network owners who want to know where their environment is exposed and which control closes that gap.
Free and non-binding — afterwards you decide whether it goes further. Initial call: 30 minutes.
- SC-100 Cybersecurity Architect Expert
- AZ-700 Azure Network Engineer Associate
- AZ-500 Azure Security Engineer Associate
50+ customers
Azure Front Door · Azure DDoS Protection
Azure Application Gateway · WAF · Azure API Management
Hub-Spoke · Azure Firewall · Private Endpoints
Microsoft Entra ID · Conditional Access · PIM
Managed Identities · Azure Key Vault
Microsoft Sentinel · Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Threat landscape
What the figures say
Two studies from the current year. Every figure carries the source it comes from — no estimates, no rounding up.
€211 to 270.8 billion
Total damage to the German economy. Reported as a corridor for the first time, rather than a single value.
Bitkom, Wirtschaftsschutz 2026
€160.4 to 205.8 billion
Of that, attributable to cyberattacks alone.
Bitkom, Wirtschaftsschutz 2026
76%
Share of cyberattacks in total damages. 70% a year earlier, 59% five years ago.
Bitkom, Wirtschaftsschutz 2026
63%
of companies registered an increase in attacks over the past twelve months.
Bitkom, Wirtschaftsschutz 2026
69%
expect a further increase. Not a single company expects a decline.
Bitkom, Wirtschaftsschutz 2026
119
new vulnerabilities per day, 24% more than in the previous reporting period.
BSI, Lagebericht (IT Security Report) 2025
950
reported ransomware cases. In 72% of them, data was leaked.
BSI, Lagebericht (IT Security Report) 2025
around 80%
of reported attacks targeted small and medium-sized companies.
BSI, Lagebericht (IT Security Report) 2025
Damages rise, budgets do not
The share of IT security in the IT budget is stagnating while the damage corridor moves up. Closing that gap means directing the existing budget to where it makes the largest difference.
How the BSI reads the situation
Attackers pick targets that are easy to attack and show poor resilience. Knowing and actively managing your attack surface lowers the risk immediately. That is a question of preparation, not of company size.
Methodology of the sources
Bitkom, Wirtschaftsschutz 2026, published on 26 August 2026. Representative survey of 1,003 companies with at least 10 employees and €1 million annual revenue, collected in calendar weeks 16 to 23 of 2026.
BSI, The State of IT Security in Germany 2025. Reporting period July 2024 to June 2025.
What is at stake
What happens without these controls
Four patterns that actually hit environments in industry and the German Mittelstand. On the left is how the attack gets in. On the right is how you notice that the control against it is missing.
Ransomware
How the attack runs
Encryption of data and backups after accounts have been taken over or system access has been exploited.
How you notice it is missing
Backups run through, but nobody can say when a restore was last actually tested.
Credential stuffing
How the attack runs
Automated sign-in attempts using credentials from third-party leaks against your login screens and APIs.
How you notice it is missing
The sign-in logs show waves of failed sign-ins across many accounts, and individual accounts get locked out although their users changed nothing.
Supply chain attacks
How the attack runs
Compromised or tampered packages and build tools that reach production through your pipeline.
How you notice it is missing
A build pulls a package version nobody asked for, and nobody can say who approved it.
Injection attacks
How the attack runs
Manipulated input that gets executed in SQL queries, commands or templates and exposes data.
How you notice it is missing
Database errors and aborted queries show up in the logs for inputs that could not have come from any of your forms.
Three levers
Blind spots cause more damage than sophisticated attacks
Bitkom president Ralf Wintergerst names blind spots in a company's own systems — not particularly refined attacks — as the most common cause of damage, and names three levers against them. They match what we work on.
Reading based on Bitkom, Wirtschaftsschutz 2026
Attack detection
Detection belongs in the architecture, not on top of it. We work towards hub-and-spoke environments where Azure Monitor and Log Analytics are mandated centrally: have your landing zone built by us and the detection layer comes with it rather than retrofitted. Microsoft Sentinel and Defender for Cloud are the stage above that, optional and paid. A dedicated team looks after detection.
We set up round-the-clock on-call on request. What it covers, what it costs and how long the setup takes are settled in the call beforehand.
Azure migration with governanceAzure alert management with NOTAClean configurations
Most gaps come not from missing tools but from configurations nobody reviews any more. We put them into the repository as code and have the source code scanned repeatedly — with a ledger that shows what was fixed and what came back.
Code Audit with DELTAStrict identity management
Identity is the perimeter. Roles are assigned through Microsoft Entra ID, administrative rights only for a limited time through Privileged Identity Management. Where legacy such as Azure AD B2C stands in the way, we migrate it without downtime.
Entra External ID migrationVulnerabilities in third-party libraries are the other half. For those, ORCA runs OWASP Dependency-Check in Azure DevOps and reads vulnerability data from a central mirror in Azure.
Standards and evidence
NIS2: establish whether you are in scope, then implement
The first question about NIS2 is not which measure is due, but whether and how you are in scope at all. Sector, company size and position in the supply chain decide that — and with it, what effort is realistic. We clarify that first and derive from it which technical and organisational measures actually have to be evidenced. What NIS2 requires at its core — risk management, attack detection, reporting paths, verifiability — emerges from the architecture with us, not from a special effort before the deadline.
TISAX: evidence for the automotive supply chain
TISAX is not a side issue of NIS2 but a requirement of its own with its own assessment logic. Anyone working as a supplier in the automotive industry needs the label regardless of whether NIS2 applies — and needs it permanently, not once. Information security, prototype protection and data protection are assessed against the VDA ISA catalogue, graded by protection requirement. We set up the Azure environment so that the required evidence emerges from day-to-day operations: segmented networks, documented access, logged changes. What a specific assessment level requires in detail, we clarify in the project.
ISO 27001: the management system underneath
ISO 27001 describes the management system the technical controls fit into. We deliver the technical side so it can be hooked into an existing ISMS — with artefacts an audit will accept: policy-as-code, audit trails, access reviews.
Why DEVDEER
Why us and not a systems integrator
Our starting point is software engineering, not product sales: we read source code, review pipelines and build the architecture ourselves rather than only configuring finished products. An integrator covers breadth across many vendors, we go deep on Microsoft Azure. You can source Azure subscriptions through us as a Cloud Solution Provider, but ownership of tenant, data and access stays entirely with you. For you that means less of a portfolio to choose from and more of a reasoned recommendation plus its implementation.
Free and non-binding. You describe your environment, we tell you what we see in it.
How you can verify our work
Four properties an environment we build has — each with the place where you can check it yourself.
Every access is individually traceable
Roles are granted through Microsoft Entra ID, administrative rights only for a limited time through Privileged Identity Management.
Verifiable in the sign-in and audit logs in Microsoft Entra ID and in the access reviews in PIM.
The configuration lives as code in the repository
Azure Policy and infrastructure definitions are versioned; every change goes through a pull request and a pipeline.
Verifiable in your repository's commit history and in the Azure Policy compliance report.
Security checks run before every merge
Static and dynamic analysis and the dependency check are mandatory steps of the CI/CD pipeline, not an optional job.
Verifiable in the pipeline runs and the branch rules of your repository.
Every finding keeps its identifier
DELTA tracks vulnerabilities across audit cycles — including returners and fix reports that the next audit disproves.
Verifiable in the trend table for each finding.
Where Your Environment Stands Today
It starts with an assessment in three steps. From there it becomes either a clearly scoped piece of work or the starting point for ongoing Azure security consulting. We agree scope and timeframe with you beforehand, so you know what you are signing up for.
Step 01
Access and context
You give us read access to the subscription in question, name one contact from operations and hand over the architecture and network diagrams that exist.
Duration: 30 minutes on your side
Step 02
Review of the six layers
We look at the network layout, applications and APIs, identities, workloads, your testing practice and your detection in your actual environment.
Duration: 2 to 3 working days
Step 03
Assessment and sequence
You get a read on which layers hold, where the gaps sit and in which order closing them pays off.
Duration: 1 to 2 working days
Free and non-binding. In the call you get a reliable timeframe for your scope. The call takes 30 minutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do we need an Azure Firewall or are network security groups enough?
Network security groups filter on IP addresses, ports and protocols, and for separating subnets they are often enough. They reach their limit as soon as you want to restrict outbound traffic by destination name, log it centrally, or enforce the same rules consistently across several spokes. That is where Azure Firewall comes in: it sits in the hub, sees the traffic of every attached network and allows rules at application level. In practice we use both together, not one instead of the other. Which combination makes sense for you depends on how many spokes you run and what evidence you have to produce about your traffic.
How long does a security assessment take?
That depends mainly on the size of the subscription, the number of applications and how well the current state is documented. A single application with a clear architecture is reviewed far faster than an environment that has grown over years across several tenants with unclear ownership. So we fix the scope before we start instead of quoting a flat figure that will not hold. In the first conversation we clarify what should be reviewed, and you get a reliable timeframe for exactly that scope.
What does a penetration test cost?
The price follows the scope: how many systems and interfaces are tested, whether we test from the outside only or additionally with a regular user account, and whether a retest after remediation is included. A single web application sits well below a review of several connected systems with their own role model. We deliberately do not publish a list price, because without a scope it would say nothing. The useful order is the other way round: first settle what has to be tested, then the effort that follows from it. That is part of the first conversation and costs you nothing.
Can we implement Zero Trust without our own security team?
Yes. Zero Trust is primarily a question of configuration rather than team size: Conditional Access, role-based access control and Privileged Identity Management are built into Microsoft Entra ID. The effort sits in designing the rules and rolling them out without stopping day-to-day operations. We take that part on, your team gets the rules explained and maintains them afterwards. If you would rather not cover ongoing operations yourself, they can be handed over to our managed service.
How do you work with our existing IT department?
Your IT department stays accountable, we work alongside it. In practice that means joint reviews, changes through your existing processes and approvals, and documentation where your team already looks for it. We do not stand up a second toolchain next to yours, we work in yours. Where knowledge is missing we train it in rather than building a dependency. The goal is that your team can run the environment without us once the project ends.
Working Across Germany, Rooted in Magdeburg
We work for clients throughout the DACH region, with a focus on southern Germany. Collaboration is remote-first: architecture work, reviews and incident support run through the tools your team already uses, which makes them quick to arrange. We come on site where it makes a difference, for example when setting up a project, for workshops spanning several departments, or for the sign-off of security-critical changes. Our office is in Magdeburg, and that is where the team looking after your environment sits. For you that means fixed contacts instead of rotating responsibilities, wherever your own site happens to be.
Next step
Ready to create impact?
Tell us briefly what it’s about – by email or in a non-binding conversation. We listen, ask the right questions, and show how we can help in a solution-oriented and pragmatic way.
What happens next
- 01
Describe your case
Three fields, no sign-up. Two minutes is enough.
- 02
Personal reply
Stefanie Heine gets back to you within one business day.
- 03
Non-binding first conversation
We listen, ask the right questions, and show how we can help.
- hello@devdeer.com
- +49 (0) 391 - 55 68 00 5 0
- Herderstraße 31, 39108 Magdeburg
Your contact

Stefanie Heine
Executive Assistant
0/500 characters
We respond within one business day.